Crypto Travel Rule Lookup: Country-by-Country Compliance Guide
Check Travel Rule requirements by country. Understand FATF compliance thresholds, required data fields, and how different jurisdictions implement the Travel Rule.
Travel Rule requirements are based on publicly available regulatory guidance and may change as jurisdictions update their legislation. This tool does not constitute legal or compliance advice.
What Is the Travel Rule?
The Travel Rule is a regulatory requirement that obligates financial institutions and Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) to share identifying information about the originator and beneficiary of a transaction when the transfer exceeds a specified threshold. In the crypto industry, this means that exchanges, custodians, and other regulated platforms must collect and transmit personal data alongside certain transfers.
The rule originates from FATF (Financial Action Task Force) Recommendation 16, which was first designed for traditional wire transfers and later extended to virtual assets in 2019. FATF itself does not enforce the rule: it sets standards that member countries are expected to implement through their own national legislation. This means the specific thresholds, data fields, and enforcement timelines vary from one jurisdiction to another.
The goal of the Travel Rule is to combat money laundering and terrorist financing by ensuring that transaction participants can be identified. For crypto businesses, compliance requires integrating with Travel Rule protocols that facilitate secure data exchange between VASPs before or during a transfer.
Thresholds by Region
One of the biggest sources of confusion around the Travel Rule is the variation in thresholds across jurisdictions. FATF recommends a baseline threshold of $1,000 USD (or equivalent), but individual countries have adopted different amounts based on their own risk assessments and regulatory frameworks.
| Jurisdiction | Threshold | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| United States | $3,000 | FinCEN applies the existing BSA wire transfer threshold |
| European Union | €1,000 | Transfer of Funds Regulation under MiCA framework |
| Japan | ¥0 (all transfers) | No minimum threshold: applies to every transaction |
| Singapore | SGD 1,500 | MAS Payment Services Act |
| South Korea | KRW 1,000,000 | VASP reporting under the Special Act |
| Switzerland | CHF 1,000 | FINMA guidelines aligned with FATF |
| Thailand | THB 0 (all transfers) | SEC Thailand requires data for all VASP transfers |
For VASPs operating across multiple jurisdictions, the practical approach is to comply with the strictest applicable threshold. If a transfer involves a counterparty in Japan (where all transfers are covered) and one in the US (where the threshold is $3,000), the stricter Japanese requirement applies.
Required Data Fields
When a transfer triggers the Travel Rule, the originating VASP must collect and transmit specific information about both the sender and the recipient. The exact fields vary by jurisdiction, but the FATF baseline includes the following data points.
Originator Information
- Full name of the originator
- Account number or wallet address used for the transaction
- Physical address, national identity number, customer identification number, or date and place of birth
Beneficiary Information
- Full name of the beneficiary
- Account number or wallet address used for the transaction
Some jurisdictions require additional fields. The EU's Transfer of Funds Regulation, for example, requires beneficiary address or date of birth regardless of amount for crypto transfers. Japan requires the originator's address and date of birth for all transfers. VASPs need to implement systems that can adapt data collection based on the jurisdictions involved in each transaction.
Implementation Status by Region
Travel Rule adoption is uneven across the globe. Some countries have fully enforced the rule with active penalties for non-compliance, while others are still in the process of drafting legislation or have not yet taken action. The implementation landscape can be broadly categorized into four groups.
Fully Enforced
Countries where the Travel Rule is actively enforced with clear regulations, supervisory oversight, and penalties for non-compliance. This group includes the United States, Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Switzerland, the EU member states (under MiCA), the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, Hong Kong, the UAE, and Thailand. These jurisdictions have functioning enforcement mechanisms and VASPs operating within them must comply.
Implementing
Countries that have passed legislation or issued guidance but are still building out enforcement infrastructure. India and Mexico fall into this category. The regulatory framework exists on paper, but compliance monitoring and penalties may not yet be fully operational.
Planned
Countries that have announced plans to adopt the Travel Rule or are in the consultation phase. Brazil and South Africa are working toward implementation but have not yet enacted binding requirements for VASPs.
Not Adopted
Countries where no Travel Rule legislation has been introduced for virtual assets. Nigeria and several other developing markets have not yet extended their anti-money laundering frameworks to cover VASP-to-VASP data sharing. VASPs serving customers in these jurisdictions should still apply best practices, as FATF peer reviews may prompt regulatory changes.
VASP Compliance Solutions
Complying with the Travel Rule requires VASPs to securely exchange customer data with counterparty institutions before completing a transfer. Several technology providers have built protocols and platforms to facilitate this exchange.
| Provider | Protocol | Coverage |
|---|---|---|
| Notabene | IVMS101-based messaging | 170+ VASPs, multi-jurisdictional support |
| Chainalysis | Chainalysis Compliance | Blockchain analytics with Travel Rule integration |
| Sygna | Sygna Bridge | Asia-Pacific focused, CoolBitX product |
| TRISA | Travel Rule Information Sharing Architecture | Open-source, decentralized directory protocol |
| 21 Analytics | 21 Travel Rule | Swiss-based, multi-protocol interoperability |
The main challenge for VASPs is interoperability. Different compliance providers use different messaging protocols, and a transfer between two VASPs using different solutions requires protocol bridging. Industry efforts such as the IVMS101 data standard and the Universal Solution for Travel Rule (USTR) initiative aim to solve this fragmentation.
Challenges for Crypto Businesses
Travel Rule compliance presents several practical challenges that go beyond simply collecting customer data. VASPs must determine whether a counterparty address belongs to another VASP or a self-hosted wallet, because the Travel Rule only applies to VASP-to-VASP transfers in most jurisdictions. This requires address attribution capabilities, often provided by blockchain analytics firms.
Cross-border transfers are particularly complex. When a transfer involves VASPs in different jurisdictions with different thresholds and data requirements, the originating VASP must determine which rules apply and ensure the correct data fields are transmitted. Sunset clauses, transitional provisions, and evolving enforcement priorities add further layers of uncertainty.
Privacy is another concern. Transmitting personal data between institutions creates a broader attack surface for data breaches. The cryptographic protocols used by Travel Rule solutions are designed to protect this data, but the requirement to share it at all is a departure from the pseudonymous nature of blockchain transactions.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the FATF Travel Rule?
The FATF Travel Rule is Recommendation 16 from the Financial Action Task Force, an intergovernmental body that sets anti-money laundering standards. It requires financial institutions and VASPs to collect and share originator and beneficiary information for transfers above a certain threshold. FATF updated the rule in 2019 to explicitly include virtual asset transfers, requiring the same level of transparency that already applies to traditional wire transfers.
What threshold triggers the Travel Rule?
FATF recommends a $1,000 USD threshold, but each country sets its own amount. The US uses $3,000, the EU uses €1,000, and Japan applies the rule to all transfers with no minimum threshold. Singapore sets it at SGD 1,500, South Korea at KRW 1,000,000, and most other adopting countries align with the FATF $1,000 recommendation. VASPs should comply with the strictest threshold applicable to each transfer.
Does the Travel Rule apply to self-hosted wallets?
In most jurisdictions, the Travel Rule applies only to VASP-to-VASP transfers. Transfers to or from self-hosted (unhosted) wallets are generally not covered, though some jurisdictions require VASPs to collect additional information about the self-hosted wallet owner. The EU's Transfer of Funds Regulation, for instance, requires VASPs to verify the identity of the self-hosted wallet owner for transfers above €1,000.
What data must be shared under the Travel Rule?
At minimum, the originator's full name, account number (or wallet address), and an identifier such as address, national ID, or date of birth must be shared. The beneficiary's name and account number are also required. Some jurisdictions require additional fields. The data standard used by most compliance solutions is IVMS101, which defines a structured format for exchanging this information between VASPs.
How do VASPs exchange Travel Rule data?
VASPs use specialized compliance platforms such as Notabene, Chainalysis, Sygna, or TRISA to securely exchange Travel Rule data. These platforms establish encrypted communication channels between counterparty VASPs and transmit the required information before or during the transfer. The main challenge is interoperability, as different providers use different protocols and not all solutions can communicate with each other natively.
What happens if a VASP does not comply with the Travel Rule?
Penalties vary by jurisdiction but can include fines, license suspension or revocation, and enforcement actions from financial regulators. In jurisdictions with active enforcement (such as Japan, South Korea, and the EU), non-compliance carries significant business risk. VASPs that fail to comply may also be cut off from correspondent relationships with compliant institutions, effectively limiting their ability to process cross-border transfers.
Is the Travel Rule the same in every country?
No. While FATF sets the baseline standards, each country implements the Travel Rule through its own legislation. This means thresholds, required data fields, enforcement timelines, and penalties differ across jurisdictions. Some countries (like Japan and Thailand) have adopted stricter requirements than FATF recommends, while others have not yet implemented the rule at all. VASPs operating internationally must track the requirements in every jurisdiction where they or their counterparties operate.
How does the Travel Rule affect stablecoin transfers?
Stablecoin transfers are treated the same as any other virtual asset transfer under the Travel Rule. If a stablecoin transfer between two VASPs exceeds the applicable threshold, the originating VASP must collect and transmit the required originator and beneficiary data. This applies regardless of the stablecoin used: USDC, USDT, DAI, and all others are subject to the same rules. Platforms like Spark that facilitate stablecoin transfers must ensure Travel Rule compliance when operating in regulated jurisdictions.
This tool is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or regulatory advice. Travel Rule requirements change as jurisdictions update their legislation. Always consult a qualified compliance professional for guidance specific to your business and operating jurisdictions.
Build with Spark
Integrate bitcoin, Lightning, and stablecoins into your app with a few lines of code.
Read the docs →
